Viral Fury, Empty Wallets

Ragebait marketing has emerged as a highly used strategy for brands seeking to cut through the noise of a crowded digital landscape. By provoking controversy, companies can generate massive attention, fuel social media debates, and amplify their brand’s visibility—sometimes even without a meaningful product or clear value proposition. This approach, perfected by online influencers and now embraced by major brands, leverages the algorithms of social platforms that reward engagement, regardless of whether the sentiment is positive or negative.

However, attention alone is not a reliable indicator of sales.

While campaigns like Friend’s AI necklace or Nucleus Genomics’ fertility ads may go viral, the spike in awareness rarely translates into sustained revenue growth. The reality is that most consumers who react to outrage are not the ones making purchases—they’re simply participating in the spectacle. The result is often a disconnect between viral fame and actual business outcomes, with brands left with a large audience but a shrinking customer base.

Worse, ragebait strategies can erode brand perception and polarize consumer sentiment. By courting controversy, brands alienate moderate audiences and narrowing their appeal to a small group of zealot fans. This polarization can make recovery from backlash difficult and limit long-term market expansion (see 2017 Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad and 2025 American Eagle Jeans ad with Sydney Sweeney for notable failure and a long road to recovery). The most loyal customers may remain, but the broader market often moves on, leaving brands with a reputation for controversy rather than trust or value.

For brand strategy teams, the caution is clear: while ragebait can offer a shortcut to visibility, it is not a path to consistent and longitudinal growth. Relying on outrage risks hard-coding negative associations, accelerating brand wear-out, and pushing previously neutral or curious consumers into the “never buy” category. Over time, this will shrink addressable audiences, making it harder to win back mainstream trust or expand into new segments. Instead, brands should prioritize strategies that foster authentic connection, relevance, and value—building loyalty that lasts beyond the next viral controversy.

———

**Referenced Washington Post Article:**

The Washington Post article, “[You might hate these companies’ ads. That’s the point.],” explores how ragebait has become a mainstream marketing strategy, with brands deliberately provoking outrage to gain attention and drive engagement. The piece highlights several recent campaigns, from Friend’s AI necklace to Nucleus Genomics’ fertility ads, and examines the broader cultural and algorithmic trends that make controversy profitable in the digital age.